8th Hong Kong Innovative Users Group
Annual Meeting
3 and 4 December 2007
The Hong Kong Institute of Education
HKIUG "Be Innovative" Award - Selection Criteria
HKIUG “Be Innovative” Award
At the 8th Hong Kong Innovative Users Group Annual Meeting it is proposed that a “Be Innovative”award will be made for the paper or presentation which demonstrates a unique, creative or effective application of products marketed by Innovative Interfaces Inc.
The purpose of the award is to encourage a larger pool of quality papers or presentations submitted for the IUG Meeting, and to recognize and highlight the work being done to improve library management and service delivery through the application or development of these products.
The award is similar in concept to the “Be Innovative” award presented by Innovative Interfaces at its North American IUG. However, in recognition of the smaller number of libraries using Innovative products in Hong Kong, the award will be open to any individual or organization submitting a paper for the HKIUG.
The award will consist of a plaque or trophy and will be made to the presenter(s) of the paper during the HKIUG (with exact timing to be determined when the IUG program is established). The award will be presented by the senior representative of Innovative Interfaces Inc. at the meeting, and will acknowledge both the individuals and their parent organization.
Eligibility Criteria
The “Be Innovative” award will be judged on the following criteria;
Selection Panel and Procedures
The Selection Panel will conduct its evaluations between the 12th November and 30th November. The Selection Panel may seek additional information from potential candidates for the award where appropriate.
The Selection Panel may elect not to make an award if it is felt that the papers are not of an adequate standard.
Example
Name (Institute) |
RPT*(A) |
RPT(B) |
RPT(C) |
RPT(D) |
RPT(E) |
Total votes |
Total scores |
Paper
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
N.A. |
Paper
|
X |
|
|
- |
- |
2 |
N.A. |
Paper
|
3 |
X |
- |
3 |
3 |
3 |
N.A. |
Paper
|
1 |
X |
2 |
- |
1 |
3 |
N.A. |
Paper 5 (Inst B & C) |
2 |
X |
X |
1 |
- |
2 |
N.A. |
*RPT(A) – representative of Institute A.
As Paper 1 receives the highest number of votes, the winner in this example is Paper 1.
Example 2:
Name (Institute) |
RPT*(A) |
RPT(B) |
RPT(C) |
RPT(D) |
RPT(E) |
Total votes |
Total scores |
Paper
|
X |
|
|
2 |
|
4 |
10 |
Paper
|
X |
2 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
9 |
Paper
|
3 |
X |
- |
1 |
1 |
3 |
N.A. |
Paper
|
1 |
X |
2 |
- |
- |
2 |
N.A. |
Paper 5 (Inst B & C) |
2 |
X |
X |
- |
- |
1 |
N.A. |
As both Paper 1 and Paper 2 obtain the same number of the highest votes, the winner will be determined by the paper with the highest scores received. Therefore, the winner in this example is also Paper 1.